<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hitting the fan</title>
	<link>http://designbuildop.hansmanns.org/2011/12/08/hitting-the-fan/</link>
	<description>A hobby journey with Eric Hansmann</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 23:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://designbuildop.hansmanns.org/2011/12/08/hitting-the-fan/#comment-18</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designbuildop.hansmanns.org/2011/12/08/hitting-the-fan/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by Bernie! I do hope to rebuild this and I hope it will be in a room larger than the original 11x11 foot space. No track was laid before the recent move so the plan can be altered when I get to that moment again. I'm trying to repost severl of the original psotings to illustrate the prototype area as well. You are correct that it is a complex track arrangement, but that is what the prototype was like with three railroads crossing at grade. I can't even imaging the original PRR traffic on their busy C&#038;P mainline through here and trying to squeeze a W&#038;LE or N&#038;SS freight through the interlocking. Model wise, the PRR tracks are just scenery and not operational. Even in a future, larger space, I'd rather focus on the two smaller lines and their traffic density than attempt the PRR. 
  - Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by Bernie! I do hope to rebuild this and I hope it will be in a room larger than the original 11&#215;11 foot space. No track was laid before the recent move so the plan can be altered when I get to that moment again. I&#8217;m trying to repost severl of the original psotings to illustrate the prototype area as well. You are correct that it is a complex track arrangement, but that is what the prototype was like with three railroads crossing at grade. I can&#8217;t even imaging the original PRR traffic on their busy C&#038;P mainline through here and trying to squeeze a W&#038;LE or N&#038;SS freight through the interlocking. Model wise, the PRR tracks are just scenery and not operational. Even in a future, larger space, I&#8217;d rather focus on the two smaller lines and their traffic density than attempt the PRR.<br />
  - Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://designbuildop.hansmanns.org/2011/12/08/hitting-the-fan/#comment-13</link>
		<author>Bernard</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://designbuildop.hansmanns.org/2011/12/08/hitting-the-fan/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>That is a very complex track arrangement. Can you allocate it to a bigger space or perhaps simplify it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very complex track arrangement. Can you allocate it to a bigger space or perhaps simplify it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

